If can we separate the stagnant market from other markets, can we be so much more accurate?
This project was written to research it. It is just the tiny part of the begining.
And this is a very necessary but very small side function in the main function. Lets start :
Hi users, I had this idea in my mind for a long time but I had a hard time finding the parameters that would make the market stagnant. This idea is my first original command system. Although it is very difficult to make sense of the stagnant market, I think that this command system can achieve realistic proportions. With 's index, I opened the track to determine the level. On the other hand, the prices were also using a index, and it forced me to make the limitations between the levels in a logical way. But the good thing is that since the bandwidth uses a larger period, we are able to print normal values at extreme buy and sell values.
In terms of price, we can define excessive purchase and sale values as the period is smaller. I have repeatedly looked at the limit values that determine the bull, bear, and bandwidth ( ), and I think this is the right one. Then I have included these values in the probability set.
The bull and bear market did not form the intersection of the cluster, and because there are connected events, the stagnant market, which is the intersection, will be added to the other markets with the same venn diagram logic and the sum of the probability set will be 1. is equal to. I hope that we can renew the number generators in the very important parameters of machine learning such as Markov Process with generators dependent on dependent variables, which bring us closer to reality. This function is open to development and can be made of various ideas on machine learning. Best wishes.
This code is open source under the MIT license. If you have any improvements or corrections to suggest, please send me a pull request via the github repository https://github.com/user-Noldo
A few years ago I played a small role in a machine learning study.
It was about engineering, but for finance, we just think that our variables are different, the basic logic is the same.
I will share the commands publicly.
First, I'm going to try some major indicators and oscillators.
Then I will look for ways to use it effectively in this system.
I decided on this new property :
And I realize that there is not a completely proper Deep Learning Script in Tradingview.
I hope I can make it and share it with everyone.
Because the idea is superior to the idea and is open to development.So deep learning scripts will be open source.
I will just get MIT license.
- Dow factor used instead of Bollinger Band Width then script is more accurate and rapid now.
- Indicator design updates.
More information for Dow Factor , here is my script about Dow Theory :
- All bugs fixed.
- Method option added. You can calculate odds with Money Flow Index (MFI) and Relative Strength Index (RSI) methods now !!
- Periods minimum value descreased to 2 .
The index factor in the Dow theory was taken into account .
It now takes into account the effect of volume and index - independent variable, the price(source-close) - dependent variable.
Before starting the analysis, select the relevant market from the menu, the system will set the appropriate index itself.
Factor loads were adjusted.
All bugs fixed.
이 스크립트의 오써는 참된 트레이딩뷰의 스피릿으로 이 스크립트를 오픈소스로 퍼블리쉬하여 트레이더들로 하여금 이해 및 검증할 수 있도록 하였습니다. 오써를 응원합니다! 스크립트를 무료로 쓸 수 있지만, 다른 퍼블리케이션에서 이 코드를 재사용하는 것은 하우스룰을 따릅니다. 님은 즐겨찾기로 이 스크립트를 차트에서 쓸 수 있습니다.
이 정보와 게시물은 TradingView에서 제공하거나 보증하는 금융, 투자, 거래 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권고 사항을 의미하거나 구성하지 않습니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참고하세요.