Glitch420

ETH.XBT P-Modeling Pt X.2 Shadow Matrix with Cajun Vectors

Glitch420 업데이트됨   
KRAKEN:ETHBTC   이더리움 / 비트코인
Welcome Hyperspace Agent,


This is continuation of PT X.1.

Technical Protocols Found:

Two Inverted Cup & Handles: Nestled, Equalized, and Critical 010 at their focal points. Anchored By Shadow Fractals, supported by the geometric linear matrices..

Root Wave Structure : Inverse M Wave. Formation A-1. {00-1-2-3-4-5- / 00-1-2-3-4-5}

String Harmonic Sequences Supports link and junctions. = Levels defined.

Focal Points: Collapsed between Nestled C&H's; Shadow Anchored Equalization = Extreme Probability for Fractal Execution.


Follow the white fractal. The only change is IF it is to being shifted, known as 'fractal error'.
Fractal Error was noted at 3 days.
Fractal laid within 3 days of error.

Goal is nailing the timing.
Seems I was off by 1 month from my initial April 20th, prediction. Nothing has changed.

Would love to be wrong.
Would love to be right.
Failure is a necessary component of success.

Be fluid like water.
_______________________________________

Ask yourself..

Is the Cat Alive ? or Is the Cat Dead?

Or do we hang in the balance between suspended animation and the ideal that being alive and dead is acceptable?

Laugh now, cry later..

Thoughts to Ponder in these crazy times,
Thanks for Pondering it with me,

Glitch420
코멘트:
Re-adjust idea template by sliding the lower axis bar sideways to stretch the image into focus.
코멘트:
Baseline:

액티브 트레이드:
액티브 트레이드:
Tic. Toc.

액티브 트레이드:
Timing error of fractal placement was 3 days into the future.

We are now aligned with the placed fractal and entered the shadow channel..

Will be interesting if it plays forward or inversely.

My bet is it follows the continued tree. But i have been wrong quite a few times. ;)

액티브 트레이드:
Shadow Wave Count is confirming as we speak.

Root-1-2-3-4-5-

Shadow Wave Count. Starts at Root > Ends at Wave 5.

Wave 5 is now active.

액티브 트레이드:
Added 2 days to the timing error of the placed fractal in white.

Shadow Fractal Timing Error in Stage 1 was 3 days.

Shadow Fractal Timing Error in Stage 2 is now 2 days.


Error is placement of fractal within timing spread of the vector epoch.

액티브 트레이드:
Proposition B formed. (light blue fractal placement-into white fractal sequence).
Notice how the Yellow inverted Cup allowed a outlier to occur. Depicted by the orange box named Outlier.

Notice how we have a red inverted cup as well, whose outlier has still yet to occur.

This gears my evidence towards us completing an outlier on the Red inverted Cup and handle formation.

This would lead into an extension of the white fractal superimposed from the new Outlier Fractal from the red cup.

This gives me a small long potential.

Let's see.
Proposition A is the white fractal getting executed.
액티브 트레이드:
We can either ; Proposition A or B.

A: Execute Proposition A. (White fractal execution).

OR.

B. Execute Proposition B. (Orange Outlier Range + Light Blue Fractal + into shifted White Fractal).

코멘트:
As stated before.

Inverted Cup and Handle formations like this are very unique, as they have specific requirements.

Cup Outlier.

Tip Execution.

Shadow Anchored.
액티브 트레이드:
Proposition B is looking very juicy..


Lemme Held if it outliers over the red inverted cup and handle formation (mirroring that of that yellow cup before execution.

코멘트:
ETH.XBT long - play the range - enter for ETH.XBT short.


I love this pair.

Slow and steady baby.
액티브 트레이드:
Proposition B is confirmed.

액티브 트레이드:
Proposition B is still extremely active and valid.

Outlier on Red Inverted Cup and Handle is actualizing.


주문취소됨:
New idea incoming shortly.

코멘트:
oppsss wrong idea. ignore that. above ^
액티브 트레이드:
outlier complete.


awaiting confirmation of ending cup and handle formation.
액티브 트레이드:
narrative about to actualize... which way.. who knows. :) Planning for both :)

코멘트:

looking for alignment :)
거래청산: 스탑 닿음:
액티브 트레이드:
주문취소됨:
코멘트:
its incredible. It simple repeat the formation.

remarkable.

if You look at te shadow cup in red, its linear continues the cup and acts as lower boundary for the future price.

Same with the yellow cup.

The mistake was missing the geometry of divergences and staying bias to a narrative that held little power.

What is very interesting is the equalization line where narrative was to be successive. Quite interesting.

Interesting binary mechanics. One i am watching very closely.
코멘트:
The defined narrative Failure was right before AUG started.

면책사항

이 정보와 게시물은 TradingView에서 제공하거나 보증하는 금융, 투자, 거래 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권고 사항을 의미하거나 구성하지 않습니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참고하세요.