Since i try to test ermanometry on many instruments only one test satisfy me fast full. Weekly chart of BTCUSD. Erman wrote in his book, that only daily should be used (as the highest timeframe used) but since February 2018 in case of BTC weekly chart is more accurate to get intresting turning points. The lower timeframe (i tried to test even 1h) the more mistakes we get. If You have some questions to the chart above, feel free simply to ask me;)
코멘트:
Intresting thing is that after CFD for BTC are tradeable (since december 2017) not long after that this ermanometry waving has started to work. It has not worked well, when i have analysed it before that time mark (december 2017). Sooo is my little conspiracy theory, maybe true maybe not. Time will tell.
코멘트:
Ina case of ripple there is one huge turning week (13-19 August candle). It is probably first time on weekly chart of Ripple when ermanometry have showed power.
코멘트:
XEMUSD. Turning week 20-26 August.
코멘트:
BCH is somewhat "retarted" in that case:
코멘트:
Ethereum 13-19 August
Is this unbreakable? I dont guarantee that. That can guarantee market makers (representatives of commercial and banking beliefs)
Is this unbreakable? I dont guarantee that. That can guarantee market makers (representatives of commercial and banking beliefs)
코멘트:
Verge:
One candle of mistake, but dip was made, as we can see.
One candle of mistake, but dip was made, as we can see.
코멘트:
Komodo - one week to early, but dip is visible.
코멘트:
Zclassic - very early dip
코멘트:
Zclassic situation 2- in this case one week later local dip was made:
코멘트:
And now two possible ways (just like Bitcoin have)
First bearish (retest of last dip with Stop Losses clearing)
First bearish (retest of last dip with Stop Losses clearing)
코멘트:
Second bullish
