Welcome back. This is Part 37 of Bitcoins algorithm. This algorithm starts on 3.22.18 and starts at Model A and goes to Model T. We are currently almost done rendering Model T. Make sure to come back for updates on this thread.
There are certain things in my methodology that I am working on as we go. Like combining models thru sequential model blending. Sequential Blending is the ability to connect models that are geometrically in synchronization with one another due to a variety of variables that line up perfectly. Model S and Model T is an example of a perfect line up. The perfect storm for change.
Model S and T are the first sequential blending to create a perfect geometric shape. The diamond. the ultra rare shape to be rendered in the geometric background noise, has been found.
But what does it mean?
Well.. it could mean a few things.
A full reversal in trend. Bear to Bull.
The end of a sequence. End of sequence two.
and/or the start of a new criticality shift. This would be the start of criticality shift #2.
In Part 36, I said that I needed a Lower Boundary of the Master Operator to form..
Behold. I think i found the lower boundary of the Master Operator.
This is significant as fuck.
My algorithm spits out 4 components.
A upper boundary.
A lower boundary.
A connect.
A Intersect.
We must have all 4 present for the "thing" to occur.
The only component we were missing was the confirmation of a lower boundary of the MO.
I highly suspect we have just created the LB of the MO.
This implies significant evidence that something extreme is about to happen. Something we have all been waiting for.. I hope you are ready for this.
I sure am.. Heads are going to turn when it does..
I have 18,500 modeled followed by a step 86 degree back into oblivion. Heads will turn. It is going to happen very fast and violently. But of course i am most likely wrong.. But what if I am not.. I guess we shall see.
Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!
If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
There are certain things in my methodology that I am working on as we go. Like combining models thru sequential model blending. Sequential Blending is the ability to connect models that are geometrically in synchronization with one another due to a variety of variables that line up perfectly. Model S and Model T is an example of a perfect line up. The perfect storm for change.
Model S and T are the first sequential blending to create a perfect geometric shape. The diamond. the ultra rare shape to be rendered in the geometric background noise, has been found.
But what does it mean?
Well.. it could mean a few things.
A full reversal in trend. Bear to Bull.
The end of a sequence. End of sequence two.
and/or the start of a new criticality shift. This would be the start of criticality shift #2.
In Part 36, I said that I needed a Lower Boundary of the Master Operator to form..
Behold. I think i found the lower boundary of the Master Operator.
This is significant as fuck.
My algorithm spits out 4 components.
A upper boundary.
A lower boundary.
A connect.
A Intersect.
We must have all 4 present for the "thing" to occur.
The only component we were missing was the confirmation of a lower boundary of the MO.
I highly suspect we have just created the LB of the MO.
This implies significant evidence that something extreme is about to happen. Something we have all been waiting for.. I hope you are ready for this.
I sure am.. Heads are going to turn when it does..
I have 18,500 modeled followed by a step 86 degree back into oblivion. Heads will turn. It is going to happen very fast and violently. But of course i am most likely wrong.. But what if I am not.. I guess we shall see.
Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.
The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!
If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.
As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420
코멘트:
A closer view of Model S and Model T
코멘트:
Potential LB outlier location detected.
We need a LB or UB statistical outlier to occur to keep Model T true.
I suspect a fall back to 7400 or below temporarily.
One we get close to ground zero anything can happen...
We need a LB or UB statistical outlier to occur to keep Model T true.
I suspect a fall back to 7400 or below temporarily.
One we get close to ground zero anything can happen...
코멘트:
Target range from 7421 to 7280.
Target line 7280.
Target line 7280.
코멘트:
코멘트:
Well.. this is interesting.. we have a possibility to enter the Lower Boundary of the Master Outlier.. It is unlikely but if we cross the purple line... The game changes.... That lower boundary is key. We enter that LB and that for me is confirmation of the upcoming bull run.
At least that is my logic at the moment. The purple line should def stay as the LB of the MO.
If we cross it.. hahah..
More likely though is that we reach the boarder of Model T and get denied. VERY Possible. Most probable.
At least that is my logic at the moment. The purple line should def stay as the LB of the MO.
If we cross it.. hahah..
More likely though is that we reach the boarder of Model T and get denied. VERY Possible. Most probable.
코멘트:
Targets based on low med and high probability.
코멘트:
We are right up against the Upper boundary of Model T.
the mini sentry (orange resistance lines) and the most new evil operator have laid out their last lines... The geometry does not support their reach any further it seems from this point.
Target for drop is 7435 if we get denied at the Upper boundary.
If we somehow blast.. 8175 would be the target.
But we shall see.. I think we will get denied on the upper boundary.
But that is my guess from reading my algorithm. It is subjective.
the mini sentry (orange resistance lines) and the most new evil operator have laid out their last lines... The geometry does not support their reach any further it seems from this point.
Target for drop is 7435 if we get denied at the Upper boundary.
If we somehow blast.. 8175 would be the target.
But we shall see.. I think we will get denied on the upper boundary.
But that is my guess from reading my algorithm. It is subjective.
코멘트:
I wonder what it will doo.. guess i will find out in the morning..
Still pressing on upper boundary of model T. Cant sit there forever.
Still pressing on upper boundary of model T. Cant sit there forever.
코멘트:
Ahh yes... Relief... As i thought.. Model T now has a validated upper boundary with the denial confirmation as i had bubbled.
Target 7435-7335 is now looking highly probable :).
Target 7435-7335 is now looking highly probable :).
코멘트:
코멘트:
I was wrong, Model T was not done rendering. But we are nearing some interesting cross points in the geometry.
Like I said this is theoretical and I will make incorrect calls. But I am interested to see how this is going to play out.
I was wrong, Model T was not done rendering. But we are nearing some interesting cross points in the geometry.
Like I said this is theoretical and I will make incorrect calls. But I am interested to see how this is going to play out.
코멘트:
Ethereum and Bitcoin officially have matching models..
코멘트:
Statistical Outlier for Model T is nearly it's re-entry to keep Model T true.
Target 7375 for re-entry drop target.
Target 7375 for re-entry drop target.
코멘트:
Predicted target was confirmed
Predicted target was confirmed
코멘트:
Target... lower boundary of the master operator....
No not a joke... 8500+
No not a joke... 8500+
코멘트:
D-day tomorrow.
