OPEN-SOURCE SCRIPT
업데이트됨 Falling-Rising Filter

Introduction
This is a modification of an old indicator i made. This filter aim to adapt to market trend by creating a smoothing constant using highest and lowest functions. This filter is visually similar to the edge-preserving filter, this similarity can make this filter quite good for MA cross strategies.
On The Filter Code
a = nz(a[1]) + alpha*nz(error[1]) + beta*nz(error[1])
The first 3 terms describe a simple exponential filter where error = price - a, beta introduce the adaptive part. beta is equal to 1 when the price is greater or lower than any past price over length period, else beta is equal to alpha, someone could ask why we use two smoothing variable (alpha, beta) instead of only beta thus having :
a = nz(a[1]) + beta*nz(error[1])
well alpha make the filter converge faster to the price thus having a better estimation.

In blue the filter using only beta and in red the filter using alpha and beta with both length = 200, the red filter converge faster to the price, if you need smoother results but less precise estimation only use beta.
Conclusion
I have presented a simple indicator using rising/falling functions to calculate an adaptive filter, this also show that when you create an exponential filter you can use more terms instead of only a = a[1] + alpha*(price - a[1]). I hope you find this indicator useful.
Thanks for reading !
This is a modification of an old indicator i made. This filter aim to adapt to market trend by creating a smoothing constant using highest and lowest functions. This filter is visually similar to the edge-preserving filter, this similarity can make this filter quite good for MA cross strategies.
On The Filter Code
a = nz(a[1]) + alpha*nz(error[1]) + beta*nz(error[1])
The first 3 terms describe a simple exponential filter where error = price - a, beta introduce the adaptive part. beta is equal to 1 when the price is greater or lower than any past price over length period, else beta is equal to alpha, someone could ask why we use two smoothing variable (alpha, beta) instead of only beta thus having :
a = nz(a[1]) + beta*nz(error[1])
well alpha make the filter converge faster to the price thus having a better estimation.
In blue the filter using only beta and in red the filter using alpha and beta with both length = 200, the red filter converge faster to the price, if you need smoother results but less precise estimation only use beta.
Conclusion
I have presented a simple indicator using rising/falling functions to calculate an adaptive filter, this also show that when you create an exponential filter you can use more terms instead of only a = a[1] + alpha*(price - a[1]). I hope you find this indicator useful.
Thanks for reading !
릴리즈 노트
Fixed a redundant error, thanks to aaahopper for pointing it out.오픈 소스 스크립트
진정한 트레이딩뷰 정신에 따라 이 스크립트 작성자는 트레이더가 기능을 검토하고 검증할 수 있도록 오픈소스로 공개했습니다. 작성자에게 찬사를 보냅니다! 무료로 사용할 수 있지만 코드를 다시 게시할 경우 하우스 룰이 적용된다는 점을 기억하세요.
Check out the indicators we are making at luxalgo: tradingview.com/u/LuxAlgo/
"My heart is so loud that I can't hear the fireworks"
"My heart is so loud that I can't hear the fireworks"
면책사항
이 정보와 게시물은 TradingView에서 제공하거나 보증하는 금융, 투자, 거래 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권고 사항을 의미하거나 구성하지 않습니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참고하세요.
오픈 소스 스크립트
진정한 트레이딩뷰 정신에 따라 이 스크립트 작성자는 트레이더가 기능을 검토하고 검증할 수 있도록 오픈소스로 공개했습니다. 작성자에게 찬사를 보냅니다! 무료로 사용할 수 있지만 코드를 다시 게시할 경우 하우스 룰이 적용된다는 점을 기억하세요.
Check out the indicators we are making at luxalgo: tradingview.com/u/LuxAlgo/
"My heart is so loud that I can't hear the fireworks"
"My heart is so loud that I can't hear the fireworks"
면책사항
이 정보와 게시물은 TradingView에서 제공하거나 보증하는 금융, 투자, 거래 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권고 사항을 의미하거나 구성하지 않습니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참고하세요.