PROTECTED SOURCE SCRIPT
Orderflow Bias Engine

Built a small orderflow bias engine to measure true price efficiency-not signals, not direction.
TradingView doesn’t give true tick-by-tick bid/ask.
Most tools either ignore that or fake footprint logic.
I didn’t!
Instead of absolute precision, I focused on relative effort vs result.
Instead of pretending otherwise, I leaned into relative effort vs result.
Lower TF volume delta is aggregated and mapped candle-by-candle against price displacement.
Initiative vs absorption isn’t inferred - it’s classified.
The core question isn’t who traded more -
it’s how much net aggression was required to move price one unit.
High effort, poor displacement - absorption / inventory build
Low effort, clean displacement - thinning liquidity / expansion
Features are intentionally minimal:
Candle-level classification (initiative buy/sell, buyer/seller absorption)
Rolling control score (who’s pressing vs who’s absorbing)
Bias state, not signal state
Efficiency read to detect compression vs expansion
It’s auction efficiency under imperfect data.
Structure defines location.
This just tells me whether price is being dragged or allowed to move.
If that distinction matters to you, you already know how to read it.
TradingView doesn’t give true tick-by-tick bid/ask.
Most tools either ignore that or fake footprint logic.
I didn’t!
Instead of absolute precision, I focused on relative effort vs result.
Instead of pretending otherwise, I leaned into relative effort vs result.
Lower TF volume delta is aggregated and mapped candle-by-candle against price displacement.
Initiative vs absorption isn’t inferred - it’s classified.
The core question isn’t who traded more -
it’s how much net aggression was required to move price one unit.
High effort, poor displacement - absorption / inventory build
Low effort, clean displacement - thinning liquidity / expansion
Features are intentionally minimal:
Candle-level classification (initiative buy/sell, buyer/seller absorption)
Rolling control score (who’s pressing vs who’s absorbing)
Bias state, not signal state
Efficiency read to detect compression vs expansion
It’s auction efficiency under imperfect data.
Structure defines location.
This just tells me whether price is being dragged or allowed to move.
If that distinction matters to you, you already know how to read it.
보호된 스크립트입니다
이 스크립트는 비공개 소스로 게시됩니다. 하지만 이를 자유롭게 제한 없이 사용할 수 있습니다 – 자세한 내용은 여기에서 확인하세요.
면책사항
해당 정보와 게시물은 금융, 투자, 트레이딩 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권장 사항으로 간주되지 않으며, 트레이딩뷰에서 제공하거나 보증하는 것이 아닙니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참조하세요.
보호된 스크립트입니다
이 스크립트는 비공개 소스로 게시됩니다. 하지만 이를 자유롭게 제한 없이 사용할 수 있습니다 – 자세한 내용은 여기에서 확인하세요.
면책사항
해당 정보와 게시물은 금융, 투자, 트레이딩 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권장 사항으로 간주되지 않으며, 트레이딩뷰에서 제공하거나 보증하는 것이 아닙니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참조하세요.