Lately, I’ve noticed a pattern in many idea comment sections — perfectly structured replies that sound smart but feel… robotic.
It made me wonder how much of the community interaction we see here is actually human anymore.
🔍 Why it matters
TradingView was built around discussion and idea sharing.
But if AI tools start filling comment sections, it becomes harder to tell whether you’re learning from real traders or just reading automated feedback.
💡 How to spot AI-generated comments
Too polished: Sentences are perfectly balanced, emotionless, and often repeat the same structure.
Generic praise: “Great analysis, thanks for sharing!” — repeated under hundreds of different tickers.
No real chart feedback: They never mention levels, entries, risk, or timing.
Repetitive language: Look for identical sentences or phrases across multiple ideas.
🧭 Why I wrote this
This isn’t to criticize anyone — I actually use AI for research myself.
But I believe human experience, real charts, and emotion still matter in trading.
AI can support us, but it shouldn’t replace our community.
📣 What do you think?
Have you noticed more AI-style comments lately?
Do you think they help, or do they make it harder to learn from others?
Follow if you want more educational posts about real market logic, trading psychology, and tech’s impact on trading.
#AI #tradingview #education #markets #tradingpsychology #daytrading #stocks #community
It made me wonder how much of the community interaction we see here is actually human anymore.
🔍 Why it matters
TradingView was built around discussion and idea sharing.
But if AI tools start filling comment sections, it becomes harder to tell whether you’re learning from real traders or just reading automated feedback.
💡 How to spot AI-generated comments
Too polished: Sentences are perfectly balanced, emotionless, and often repeat the same structure.
Generic praise: “Great analysis, thanks for sharing!” — repeated under hundreds of different tickers.
No real chart feedback: They never mention levels, entries, risk, or timing.
Repetitive language: Look for identical sentences or phrases across multiple ideas.
🧭 Why I wrote this
This isn’t to criticize anyone — I actually use AI for research myself.
But I believe human experience, real charts, and emotion still matter in trading.
AI can support us, but it shouldn’t replace our community.
📣 What do you think?
Have you noticed more AI-style comments lately?
Do you think they help, or do they make it harder to learn from others?
Follow if you want more educational posts about real market logic, trading psychology, and tech’s impact on trading.
#AI #tradingview #education #markets #tradingpsychology #daytrading #stocks #community
Sharing clean, logical market analysis focused on liquidity, structure and volume. No signals, no pressure — just education. If you want more insights, you’re welcome to join: t.me/CE3vdc5m72w4MjRk
면책사항
해당 정보와 게시물은 금융, 투자, 트레이딩 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권장 사항으로 간주되지 않으며, 트레이딩뷰에서 제공하거나 보증하는 것이 아닙니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참조하세요.
Sharing clean, logical market analysis focused on liquidity, structure and volume. No signals, no pressure — just education. If you want more insights, you’re welcome to join: t.me/CE3vdc5m72w4MjRk
면책사항
해당 정보와 게시물은 금융, 투자, 트레이딩 또는 기타 유형의 조언이나 권장 사항으로 간주되지 않으며, 트레이딩뷰에서 제공하거나 보증하는 것이 아닙니다. 자세한 내용은 이용 약관을 참조하세요.