Ethereum. P-Modeling Pt 12. Reversal Supernova? Ya Ok...

업데이트됨

Welcome back. This is Pt 12. of Ethereum's Algorithm. See previous Parts if you are lost. Make sure to come back for updates :). Hit that like button, if you like what you see :)

Model H has been rendered for a few days but has tracked thru very well. Sorry for not keeping updated. I have a lot going on.

But here we are in Model H. Model G and Model H birthed the Lower Boundary of the Master Operator. This was extremely important for a number of reasons. The biggest reason that we now have an upper boundary. a intersect, a connect and now a lower boundary in the algorithm sequence. We now meet the requirements for a a criticality shift. In order to keep the lower boundary of the Master Operator true, we have the trend stay on the inside of that boundary. We are currently quite below that threshold. Meaning we must reach the purple line and fast, as its incline will quickly place us out of reach.

We validated Model H when the trend dropped right thru the tip of Model H. The outlier becomes valid when it leaves and re-enters a Model. This was confirmed.

Even more interesting is that Ethereum and Bitcoin have matching Models in two completely different subjective algorithms. Not just matching models but matching sequences too. The complexity of the geometry in the background makes it so when i find matching indicators across different algorithms exp Bitcoin and Ethereum. I take it extremely seriously. Both algorithms have matching diamond patterns. Both algorithms have validated Models with both an Upper and Lower boundary.. which was MANDATORY for the start of a criticality shift.

A Criticality shift starts at the onset of a a bunch of well times variables in the geometric background noise. I can not ignore the geometric evidence presented before me. We are definitely entering a criticality shift. This coming week will either validate that or it looks like a bunch of my algorithms look prime to have systemic failure.. But failure is not a means to an end, but a means to grow. :)

Review.
One thing you should understand is that what I am doing is new. It is Theoretical. Thus being it is theoretical, take it with a grain of salt.
I am certain i have found validity in what I am doing, so I will keep doing it. Despite any failures, or incorrect calls, or emotional builds ups only leading to disappointment. Is that not the fun of it? I found this stuff ultra fun and it works a good portion of the time it seems. But I am only human.. Humans make mistakes.
When rendering a model in my algorithm, the proposition that upholds the belief theory is subjective to a degree. I chose the best place I THINK it would go. Period. I follow the geometry as I see it in my eyes. That is subjective. No A.I. in crypyto trading has the ability to have subjectivity. But I do. No A.I algorithm created has subjectivity, unless it is a hybrid that incorporates HUMANS into it's analysis. The human operator is the most important aspect in understanding the real complex nature of human emotion and its interplay in something like crypto trading; as all bots programmed to trade (are based on emotions, and desires of the HUMAN programmer). Thus bots although automatic, ooze the emotional desires of the human programmer. An observable behavioral phenomena, to the train eyed.

The only way you can learn about my technique is to watch what i am doing. YOU WILL FIND THIS NOWHERE ELSE. As this is designed from scratch based off other research I am working on in my professional domain. This is a grand experiment, I thank you for all participating with me! Hit that like button, it lets me know you are watching like a ninja in the background!

If you are confused how i got here.. Please go back and look at my charts. They are sequentially marked by Pt's for easy identification.

As always thanks for looking,
Glitch420

노트

You could not cut it any closer on Model validation then this right here..