QuantitativeExhaustion

Wave Channel 3D

Wave Channel 3D
Built by Ricardo idea from JR & Aloakdutt from indieTrades Jan. 2010

This indicator is very easy to build. We utilize Moving Averages with a set multiplier and an offset. Specially we try to use Fibonacci sequence series numbers (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144...) as time space and multiplier (default 89, 8). Also included is Donchian Channel to locate strong trends and possible future support - resistance.


Examples of support/resistance on chart.


Dominant Price Trends


Future Support Resistance


Comparing Fibonacci Series Time Space - Multiplier


When Comparing make note of confluence support/resistance showing up with Fibonacci Series
Example uses DC

When Comparing make note of confluence support/resistance showing up with Fibonacci Series
Example without DC / Smooth MA
오픈 소스 스크립트

진정한 TradingView의 정신에 따라, 이 스크립트의 작성자는 스크립트를 오픈소스로 게시했기에 거래자들이 이해하고 확인할 수 있습니다. 작가님께 건배! 스크립트를 무료로 사용할 수 있지만, 게시물에서 이 코드를 재사용하는 것은 하우스룰을 따릅니다. 당신은 스크립트를 차트에 사용하기 위해 그것을 즐겨찾기 할 수 있습니다.

차트에 이 스크립트를 사용하시겠습니까?
study(title="3D-Wave Channel", shorttitle="3D-WC", overlay=true)
timespace = input(1)
smooth = input(89)
offsetMultiplier=input(8)
useDonchianAverage = input(false)
src = input(ohlc4)
ma = useDonchianAverage ? avg(highest(smooth),lowest(smooth)) : ema(src, smooth)
plot(ma[0], color=black, offset=offsetMultiplier*01)
plot(ma[timespace*01], color=silver, offset=offsetMultiplier*02)
plot(ma[timespace*02], color=silver, offset=offsetMultiplier*03)
plot(ma[timespace*03], color=gray, offset=offsetMultiplier*04)
plot(ma[timespace*04], color=gray, offset=offsetMultiplier*05)
plot(ma[timespace*05], color=gray, offset=offsetMultiplier*06)
plot(ma[timespace*06], color=silver, offset=offsetMultiplier*07)
plot(ma[timespace*07], color=silver, offset=offsetMultiplier*08)
plot(ma[timespace*08], color=gray, offset=offsetMultiplier*09)
plot(ma[timespace*09], color=gray, offset=offsetMultiplier*10)
plot(ma[timespace*10], color=black, offset=offsetMultiplier*11)

max_ma()=>max(ma[timespace*10],max(ma[timespace*9],max(ma[timespace*8],max(ma[timespace*7],max(ma[timespace*6],max(ma[timespace*5],max(ma[timespace*4],max(ma[timespace*3],max(ma[timespace*2],max(ma[timespace*1], ma))))))))))
min_ma()=>min(ma[timespace*10],min(ma[timespace*9],min(ma[timespace*8],min(ma[timespace*7],min(ma[timespace*6],min(ma[timespace*5],min(ma[timespace*4],min(ma[timespace*3],min(ma[timespace*2],min(ma[timespace*1], ma))))))))))

top = highest(max_ma(), smooth)
bot = lowest(min_ma(), smooth)

plot(top, color=black, offset=offsetMultiplier)
plot(bot, color=black, offset=offsetMultiplier)

코멘트

Thank you for sharing this interesting idea. The indicator initially seems to be really great based from the screenshot, but when I tested the signals they are lagging extremely behind the price movement. Even with very fast settings like smooth input(5), offsetMultiplier input(1) I could not find anything I would find useful in actual day-trading.

Don't get me wrong. I think this indicator is great when you analyze a new symbol for the very first time. It is very good to see the overall trend direction of recent weeks; to get an overall feeling where the market was headed recently.
+6 응답
Thanks for that feedback ChartArt. Have explored all the features this indicator might provide. Current and future Support/Resistance , Trend Breakouts and more?
+4 응답
ChartArt QuantitativeExhaustion
My setting in action. Useful to see the overall strongest recent trend direction (and yes, also the major past support/resistance zones).

+3 응답
ChartArt ChartArt
Period 4 smoothed on weekly SPY chart. If only trading would be always that easy :D

+3 응답
Looks even better with HA.
+4 응답
You should also compare longer time series and multipliers. I picked Fibonacci Series, showing how in the example above. More support/resistance folds, higher probability of seeing those areas again displaying support/resistance.
+4 응답
Today maybe it would have been more accurate to use this indicator, my stop loss support was broken too early
+3 응답
sigmadict sigmadict
Green live VS Grey line
I MISSED THE POP
+3 응답
Using setting (1,50,4)
+3 응답
sigmadict sigmadict
We can verify with my the S/R I previously draw. It's not far from reality, I recommend to use it as a reference and validate with a line previous S/R more precisely.
+2 응답
홈으로 스탁 스크리너 포렉스 스크리너 크립토 스크리너 이코노믹 캘린더 정보 차트 특징 프라이싱 프렌드 리퍼하기 하우스룰(내부규정) 헬프 센터 웹사이트 & 브로커 솔루션 위젯 차팅 솔루션 라이트웨이트 차팅 라이브러리 블로그 & 뉴스 트위터
프로화일 프로화일설정 계정 및 빌링 리퍼드 프렌즈 코인 나의 서포트 티켓 헬프 센터 비밀메시지 채팅 로그아웃