Great!, do you expect ZEC/BTC will rise to 0.040 in short term ?
laocreates
⋅
holding to 600?
MMA_Fighter0591
⋅
will go to 600 ?
oleg.nuau
⋅
Thank you, bratan Excavo
Samohodka
⋅
Sniper job ))
shadowforworld
⋅
Thx for your idea, we wait next run at 458+
oadig003
⋅
Please Tp 435 or 600?
pdrza8
⋅
Thank you, tovarisch Excavo!
Maroochydore
⋅
Hi EXCAVO, thank you for your charting, I have been following for some weeks now.
I want to put to rest a technical problem of charting in $ rather than BTC. The way I see it, increases in $ are largely down to the same or ratios of increase in BTC's $ value. This is very apparent in the demise of the ETH/BTC value yet the big increase in it's $ value because BTC has increased by significantly more than ETH/BTC has dropped.
I have found that multiplying the ETH/BTC value by the BTC/$ value gives pretty much the ETH/$ value, so if trades were static on ETH/BTC it would still have gone up. Therefore, what real value do we have in quoting $ values against any Alts? $ value seems intrinsic in the BTC value, so how do you know enough to chart an Alt in $ if it is ruled by a second variable that's so significant?
Andratos95
⋅
@Maroochydore, if one doesn't have any BTC but wants to acquire an alt-coin, he has to first buy BTC with fiat currency (USD for instance) and then buy the alt. So, I think that looking at the $ chart is very important for someone that wants to enter a position in an alt-coin without previously owning any BTC.